Towards
Energy Efficient Big Data Gathering
in
Densely Distributed Sensor Networks
ABSTRACT
Recently, the “big dat” emerged as a hot topic because of the tremendous
growth of the Information and Communication Technology (ICT). One of the highly
anticipated key contributors of the big data in the future networks is the
distributed Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs). Although the data generated by an
individual sensor may not appear
to be significant, the overall data generated across numerous sensors in
the densely distributed WSNs can produce a significant portion of the big data.
Energy-efficient big data gathering in
the densely distributed sensor networks is, therefore, a challenging
research area. One of the most effective solutions to address this
challenge is to utilize the sink node’s mobility to facilitate the data
gathering. While this technique can reduce energy consumption of the sensor
nodes, the use of mobile sink presents additional challenges such as
determining the sink node’s trajectory and cluster formation prior to data
collection. In this paper, we propose a new mobile sink routing and data
gathering method through network clustering based on modified Expectation- Maximization
(EM) technique. In addition, we derive an optimal number of clusters to
minimize the energy consumption. The effectiveness of our proposal is verified
through numerical results.
Literature
Survey
2. Problem Statement :
First, the network is divided to some sub-networks because of the
limited wireless communication range. For example, sensors deployed in a
building may not be able to communicate with the sensors which are distributed
in the neighboring buildings. Therefore, limited communication range may pose a
challenge for data collection from all sensor nodes.
Second, the wireless transmission consumes the energy of the
sensors. Even though the volume of data generated by an individual sensor is not significant, each
sensor requires a lot of energy to relay the data generated by surrounding sensors.
Especially in dense WSNs, the life time of sensors will be very short because
each sensor node relays a lot of data generated by tremendous number of
surrounding sensors. In order to solve these problems, we need an
energy-efficient method to gather huge volume of data from a large number of
sensors in the densely distributed WSNs.
Analysis on Existing
Networks
The data compression technology [7] is capable of shrinking the
volume of the transmitted data. Although it is easy to be implemented, the data
compression technology requires the nodes to be equipped with a big volume of
storage and high computational power. In addition, the topology control
technology can evaluate the best logical topology and reduce redundant wireless
transmissions [8], [9]. When the redundant wireless transmissions are reduced,
the required energy for wireless transmissions can be also reduced. Furthermore
flow control and routing can choose the path which consists of nodes having
high remaining energy [10], [11]. However, these techn technologies are not
able to deal with the divided networks problem.
3.Idea on proposed System:
we propose
an energy minimized clustering algorithm by using the Expectation-Maximization
(EM) algorithm for 2-dimensional Gaussian mixture distribution.
Our
proposal aims to minimize the sum of square of wireless communication distance
since the energy consumption is proportional to the square of the wireless
communication distance. Moreover, we first focus on the “data request flooding problem”
to decide the optimal number of clusters. The data request flooding problem
refers to the energy inefficiency that occurs when all the nodes broadcast data
request messages to their respective neighboring nodes. This problem wastes
energy,
particularly
in the high density WSNs. Previous research work advocates increasing the
number of clusters to reduce the data transmission energy. However, in this
paper, we point out that an excessive number of clusters can result in
performance degradation, and therefore, we propose an adequate method for deriving
the optimal number of clusters
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.